Battering Rams and Catapults: Medieval Castle Siege Tactics and Strategies

For centuries, fortified castles stood as the ultimate symbol of medieval power—but even the strongest stone walls could fall to the right siege tactics. Among the most formidable tools in a besieger’s arsenal were battering rams and catapults—massive siege engines designed to smash gates, hurl projectiles, and demoralize defenders. In this guide, we explore how these iconic medieval siege weapons were used in battle, the strategies behind their deployment, and their impact on the brutal science of castle warfare.


Illustration of a medieval battering ram attacking a stone castle wall

However, history is filled with dramatic episodes where determined attackers overcame towering fortifications through cunning tactics and ingenious siege strategies. From deception and tunneling to relentless bombardment and psychological warfare, medieval besiegers employed every means at their disposal to force a surrender. In this section, we journey deeper into the fascinating world of castle sieges—examining the methods used to break through defenses, as well as the clever countermeasures devised by defenders to resist these brutal and unrelenting assaults.


1. Battering Rams

One of the most common siege tactics was the use of battering rams. These massive wooden structures, often adorned with protective coverings, were used to ram against castle gates or walls, aiming to breach them through sheer force.

Battering Ram Siege Weapon

2. Siege Towers

Siege towers were tall wooden structures on wheels used to gain access to castle walls. Attackers could move them close to the castle’s walls, allowing troops to climb the tower and engage in hand-to-hand combat with defenders.


3. Catapults and Trebuchets

Siege engines like catapults and trebuchets were employed to launch massive projectiles, including rocks, boulders, and incendiary devices, over the castle walls. These weapons aimed to weaken the castle’s defenses and demoralize its defenders.


4. Mining

Attackers sometimes employed mining as a tactic to undermine the castle’s walls or towers. Miners would dig tunnels beneath the castle, filling them with combustible material. Once ignited, the collapsing tunnels weakened the castle’s foundations.

A Trebuchet Catapult Siege Attack on a Castle

5. Treachery and Deception

Treachery and deception were prevalent siege tactics. Spies or traitors within the castle walls might open gates or lower drawbridges to allow attackers entry. As a countermeasure, castle defenders were vigilant in detecting and thwarting such treacherous acts.


6. Starvation and Blockade

Besieging forces often employed a strategy of blockade, cutting off the castle’s supply lines to force its surrender through starvation. Castle defenders, in turn, stockpiled provisions to endure prolonged sieges.


7. Psychological Warfare

Sieging forces used psychological warfare to demoralize defenders. They might display the heads of fallen foes or send taunting messages over the castle walls, seeking to undermine the defenders’ resolve.

A Medieval Castle Being Defended Under Siege

8. Sorties and Counterattacks

Castle defenders frequently executed sorties, sallying out from the castle to attack besieging forces. These counterattacks aimed to disrupt enemy encampments and bolster defenders’ morale.


9. Boiling Oil and Molten Lead

Castle defenders utilized boiling oil, molten lead, or other hot liquids to pour over attackers attempting to scale castle walls or breach the gates.


10. Surrender Negotiations

In some cases, besieging forces initiated surrender negotiations, offering terms to castle defenders. The outcome depended on various factors, such as the strength of the castle’s defenses, the size of the besieging force, and the availability of resources.



Medieval castle siege tactics and strategies were a testament to the ingenuity and determination of both attackers and defenders.

These engagements were fraught with danger and uncertainty, as skilled military commanders devised plans to breach formidable fortifications while castle defenders employed resourcefulness and resilience to withstand the relentless assaults.

The art of siege warfare reflects the complex dynamics of medieval conflicts and the role that castles played as both symbols of power and centers of protection.

As we explore these intriguing siege tactics and strategies, we gain a deeper appreciation for the strategic complexities of medieval warfare and the lasting impact these engagements had on the course of history.


What were the main siege weapons used in medieval warfare?

The most common siege weapons included battering rams, catapults, trebuchets, ballistae, and siege towers. Each served a specific purpose in breaching walls, breaking gates, or attacking from a distance.

How did battering rams work against castle gates?

Battering rams used sheer force to smash through wooden gates or weaken stone walls. They were often protected by a wooden shed (called a “ram shed”) to shield the operators from arrows and boiling oil.

What made catapults effective in a siege?

Catapults could launch heavy stones, fireballs, or diseased carcasses over castle walls to damage structures, spread fear, or cause chaos inside the fortress. They allowed attackers to strike from a distance.

Did castle defenders have ways to stop siege engines?

Yes, defenders used tactics like dropping stones, firing arrows, pouring boiling liquids, or deploying fire to destroy siege engines. Moats and reinforced gates also helped delay or prevent attacks.

Were there strategies beyond just using siege weapons?

Definitely. Medieval sieges often included psychological warfare, starvation tactics, deception, tunneling (mining), and negotiations to force surrender without prolonged combat.

How long could a medieval siege last?

Sieges could last from a few days to several months, depending on the size of the fortress, supplies, and the strength of both attacking and defending forces.

What was the difference between a catapult and a trebuchet?

A catapult typically used tension or torsion to launch projectiles, while a trebuchet relied on a counterweight for greater range and power. Trebuchets were generally more effective against stone fortifications.